Energy Capacity Comparisons

The given table illustrates the contrast of various energies such as non-renewable, biomass, geothermal, solar energy capacity of 2010 with the projection or the view predicted to 2050. The comparison is made by two colors that is blue and red for 2010 and 2050 respectively. The unit is measured in percentage. Overall, it can viewed that the least energy capacity in 2010 is biomass, whereas the least capacity in 2050 predicted is both biomass as well as geothermal energies. On the other hand, when we consider the most likely to have capacity is non-renewable energy and solar energy in 2010 and 2050 respectively. This paragragh there will be discussion on non-renewable energy and biomass energy capacity comparision. Firstly, this non-renewable energy has great percentage of 75 capacity in the year 2010, however in 2050 it is likely to be projected to have percentage which is approximately 35. Secondly, the biomass energy capacity is likely to expand by 10% in 2050 when contrasted with capcity proportion in the year 2010. On the other side there are other two energy which is discussed in this paragraph. Starting with geothermal energy which has only 12% capacity proportion in the year 2010 and similarly with small increase by 2% in the year 2050. Finally, the solar energy which is being predicted with greater expansion of approximately 38-39% of capacityin 2050, In contrast to the previous statement, in the year 2010 it is only 8-9% capacity proportion.

The bar graph illustrates the proportion of energy storage like non-renewable energy, biomass and biofuel, water and geothermal, and solar in the year 2010, with projections made for to 2050. The unit is measured in percentage. Overall, it is proven that, non-renewable energy had highest capacity in 2010. On the other hand, biomass and biofuel was least used. Firstly, in 2010, approximately 75% of the energy generated was from non-renewable source. While, just more than one tenth of the energy storage was kept for water and geothermal energy. Additionally, biomass fuel and solar energy were 5% and 8% respectively. On the other hand, in 2050, in comparison with 2010, the non-renewable enegy consumption will drop to 35%. However, we will be seeing a rise by 7% in biomass and biofuel, which is 12%, a similar trend will be followed with solar energy as it grows to just below 40%. Finally a small rise will be observed in water and geothermal energy.

The bar graph delineates the comparison of amount of energy that can be stored by various energy generation plants in 2010 with projections made for to 2050. The units are in terms of percentage. Overall, information regarding four sources of energy are provided namely, non-renewable energy, biomass and biofuel, water and geothermal and solar. Where solar energy is said to be the maximum energy providing source in the future and both biomass and biofuel and water and geothermal are said to be the least beneficial sources of energy. In 2010, almost three quarters of energy is generated using non-renewable resources, followed by water and geothermal energy which is above 10%, while less than 10% of energy was generated using solar energy and lastly biomass and biofuel produced negligible amount of energy which would be around 5%. In 2050, the use of solar energy peaked and around 40% of energy was generated, followed by non- renewable energy sources which dropped to 35%. Lastly,both biomass and biofuel and water and geothermal at 15%.

By analysing this graph one can understand the comparison between the proportion of energy capacity in 2010 with predictions made for 2050. The graphs consists of data on four types of energies from renewable powers to non-renewable powers. In the graph, red is used to depict 2050 and subsequently blue is used for 2010. When we look at non-renewable energy, it is way over the planned percentage and meaures must be taken to so that it reaches the planned ratio by 2050. Also, when it comes to biomass and biofuel which are mostly home made and are used for agricultural purposes, there needs to be significant growth to reach the expected capacity by 2050. On the other hand, Water and geothermal energy has almost reached the expected energy capacity and might also go above the planned ratio by 2050. Whereas, solar power as energy has lot more work that needs to be done so that it reaches the expected ratio. In 2010, solar power constitues to only 10 percent and the planned ratio is way above 30 percent. So, one can conclude from the table that large amounts of effort must be put to reach planned energy capacity by 2050.

The bar graph provide information about the porportion of energy capacity in 2010 in projections made for to 2050.The data measured in percentage. In 2010, non renewable nergy constituted the llargwst porption o energy capacity,nearig 80%. this dominance is projected to decline dramatically by2050. fallng to appoximately 20%. Ths indicates a clear global trend towards reducing depedence on fossil fuels. Coverserly,renewable energy sources are expectd to see considerable growth. Solar energy ,which held a small sharte in 2010.is projected to become a major contributor by 2050 potentially exceeding 60% of the total energ capacity. this represents the most significant change and underscores the increasing promminence of solar power. Other renewable souces, uch as biomass and biofuel, and water and geothermal energy, also show projected increases, hrough less dramatic than solar. Biomss and biofuel ae expected to rise from a small percentage in 2010 to around 10-15 % by 2050. In summery, the graph forecasts a fundamental trasformation in global energy caapacity over four decades, moving from a system heavily reliant on non renewable sources to one predominantly powered by renewable energy, with the solar energy leading this trasition.