Energy Capacity Comparisons

The bar graph illustrates the consumption of energy capacity in 2010 with projections made for 2050. Overall, the graph summarise the different kinds of energy such as non-renewable energy, biomass and biofuel, water and geothermal and solar energy used in 2010 and assuming the possibility of consuming in the year 2050. To begin with, in 2010 72% of non-renewable energy was consumed and it was the highest energy used in that particular year. Additionally, biomass and biofuel usage was very less in 2010 as only 2 percent of the fuel was used, furthermore, only eleven percentage of water and geothermal were used by citizens of the country and every less (9%) percentage of people used solar energy which can be used to save electricity. On the other hand, consumption of non- renewable energy such as coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear energy may decrease upto 32 percent in the year 2050 as compared to 2010. Following, there will be no much difference in usage of water and geothermal as only one percent will be increased that is only 12%. Adding on, biomass and biofuel there will be major increase as 13% will be using and there will be rapid increase in consumption of solar in 2050.

The bar graph depicts the rate of energy capacity over a period of half a century which is from 2010 to 2050. The unit of measurement expressed is in percentage. Overall, the data provided on different sources of energies and there capacity like Non - renewable energy, Biomass and biofuel, Water and geothermal and Solar energy. While the production of Non - renewable source of energy has taken high percentage contrastly Boimass and biofuel has taken the least portion among others resources. On one hand, the availability of Non-renewable energy secures almost 75% of the energy during 2010 and it was estimated to just 35% by the year 2050 which has a drastical reduction. Moreover, the contribution of Solar resources was quite opposite which was merely below 10% in the year 2010 and seems to be hiked up almost around 50% by 2050. On the other hand, the other naturals resources of energies like Water and geothermal considered to be almost same during the period whereas Biomass and biofuel expected a change of nearly 10%.

The bar graph illustrates the percentage of energy capacity required from source of energy such as Non-renewable energy, Biomass and biofuel, Water and geothermal and Solar in the year 2010 and 2050. The units are measured in percentages. Overall, Non-renewable energy showed an upward trend when compared to biomass and biofuel. The same trend followed for solar. However, water and geothermal witnessed consistently over the periods. To begin with, there was a sharp rise in Non-renewable energy at about 75% in 2010 whereas it reduced equally at 35% in 2050. Moreover, Biomass and biofuel started at 5% in 2010 while it doubled around 12% in 2050. On the other hand,there has been remained stable in water and geothermal energy about 12% in both the years. Consequently, solar began by least 10% in 2010 whereas it climbed dramatically at 40% in 2050. The trend shows some difference in Non-renewable energy and solar. In 2050, solar stood second position in source of energy.

The bar graph illustrates the ratio of energy measurements in 2010 and the future predictions for 2050. The unit used for capturing the data is percentage. Overall, there is a huge fall in the volumes of Non-renewable energy in 2050 as compared to 2010. However, Solar energy is expected to gain popularity by over 5 times in these 40 years. The water and geothermal energy sources remain the same at around 10 percent in the year 2010 and 2025. While Biomass and bio-fuel, initially started with just 5 percent in 2010, it is believed to match the level of water and geothermal energy at over 10 percent. In the year 2010, Non-renewable energy was the most preffered choice at about 75 percent, whereas as Solar Energy was less than 10 percent. Although it is predicted that both will match their levels at about 35 percent as non-renewable energy will take a huge fall and Solar energy will climb.

The graph delineates the comparison between energy capacity proportion of 2010 and the projections suggested for the year 2050. The parameters mentioned in the graph are, sources of energy and percentage. Overall, a huge difference can be seen for non-renewable and solar energy, whereas the same magnitude of difference is not seen in the other two categories. To begin with, it is evident that the energy capacity in the year 2050 for non-renewable source will be slightly less than half of the percentage in 2010.Next, by a glance at the graph we can observe that there will be a 10% increase in biomass and biofuel source of energy by the year 2050. In comparison to the projection of 2050, we can discover hardly a change of 1% in the bracket of water and geothermal energy in 2010.On the contrary, we can notice a spike in the projection for solar enegry of approximately 30% by the year 2050.This is the largest difference seen on the graph compared to other entities.

The bar diagram compares the energy sources such as Non-renewable energy, biomass & biofuel, water & geothermal and solar energy in 2010 and 2050. The unit of measurement is percentage for references. Overall, It is evident that non-renewable energy was significantly higher percentage when compared to the other energy resources while other sources didn't exceed more than fifty perecentage over the years. To begin with, in 2010, Although production of non-renewable energy had the highest percentage, accounting for 73 % approximately. it had the least energy production from biomass and fuel, with just under 5 %. Similarily, energy capactiy from water & geothermal and solar sources had low production, with just under 15 %. On the other hand, in 2050, Constrastly, it is predicted that solar energy will have the highest energy production, accounting for 39 %. when compared to other sources. with non-renewable energy holds the second highest energy production with 35 %. Moreover, energy sources from water & geothermal sources will be slightly increased from 11% in 2010 to 12% in 2050. Additionally, the biomass and biofuel Production has increased more than 10 % in 2050.

The graph depicts the energy capacity over 4 decades with projection between the year 2010 and 2050.On the X axis we have various sources of energy and percentage on Y axis. Although there are several ups and downs over the years, now we will summarise and compare the relevant features and report them. The Non-renewable energy in the year 2010 was around 75 percent and it was one of the highest used energy capacity in whereas in 2050 there is a sudden drop which went upto 35 percent. Energy capacity from Biomass and biofuel was somewhere around 5 percent in the year 2010, and it crossed 19 percent in the year 2050. Water and geothermal energy capacity maintained almost same throughout 4 decades, which is around 10 percent. Solar energy capacity in the year 2010 was around 9 percent, but in the year 2050 there was a drastic increase in the percentage which went upto somewhere around 40 percent.

The bar graph differentiates between the percentage of energy volume (Non Renewable, Biomass and biofuel, Water and geothermal, Solar) in the year 2010 and the estimate put together for it for the year 2050. Overall, the capacity was highest for Non-renewable energy, accounting for 75%, during 2010. According to the assumption, Solar energy is going to equate to almost 40% by 2050. For the year 2010, it can be noticed in the chart that apart from the extensive use of Non-renewable energy, the use of water and geothermal is only 12%, followed by solar at 10%, and then biomass and biofuel at 5%. In contrast, for 2050, the use of non renewable energy is expected to decline, amounting to 35%, whereas the usage of biomass and biofuel will double. Furthermore, water and geothermal energy's utility will not witness major change. This will remain around 12-13%. However, Solar energy's capacity is supposed to gain substantially by approximately four times.

The given bar graph illustrates the comparison between the proportion of energy capacity in 2010 with the projections made for to 2050 for four different sources of energy. The unit measured is in percentage of energy. Overall, it can be observed that percentage of energy capacity is gradually decreasing for the sources of energy except solar energy which is predicted to reach its peak by 2050.However, non-renewable energy still has the highest proportion of energy capacity. In 2010, non-renewable source of energy had the highest capacity, almost three fourth of total energy capacity.Following that, the water and geothermal energy source comprises around 11% of energy. The solar energy and biomass and biofuel energy are found quite less which is 9% and 5% respectively. On the other hand, the prediction for 2050 are showcase that, there will be significant rise in the solar energy capacity which will around 39%. However, on the contrary, there will be drastical drop in the energy capacity of non-renewable source of energy comprising around one third of total energy capacity. Additionally, similar energy capacity is being predicted for energy sources like biomass and biofuel and water and geothermal which is 14%.

The given table illustrates the contrast of various energies such as non-renewable, biomass, geothermal, solar energy capacity of 2010 with the projection or the view predicted to 2050. The comparison is made by two colors that is blue and red for 2010 and 2050 respectively. The unit is measured in percentage. Overall, it can viewed that the least energy capacity in 2010 is biomass, whereas the least capacity in 2050 predicted is both biomass as well as geothermal energies. On the other hand, when we consider the most likely to have capacity is non-renewable energy and solar energy in 2010 and 2050 respectively. This paragragh there will be discussion on non-renewable energy and biomass energy capacity comparision. Firstly, this non-renewable energy has great percentage of 75 capacity in the year 2010, however in 2050 it is likely to be projected to have percentage which is approximately 35. Secondly, the biomass energy capacity is likely to expand by 10% in 2050 when contrasted with capcity proportion in the year 2010. On the other side there are other two energy which is discussed in this paragraph. Starting with geothermal energy which has only 12% capacity proportion in the year 2010 and similarly with small increase by 2% in the year 2050. Finally, the solar energy which is being predicted with greater expansion of approximately 38-39% of capacityin 2050, In contrast to the previous statement, in the year 2010 it is only 8-9% capacity proportion.