Teacher Feedback: PTE Summarize Group Discussion Question with Sample Answers - Page 3

Your task

You will hear a group discussion. After listening, please summarize the discussion in your own words.

“Speaker 1: So I got my essay back last night, and honestly, the feedback shook me. I thought I’d done a solid job, but the comments made it seem like I’d missed the whole point. Speaker 2: Oh no, I’ve been there. It’s so frustrating when you put in the effort and still feel like the feedback is overly critical or unclear. Sometimes I read the comments three times and still don’t know what I did wrong. Speaker 3: That’s exactly how I felt last semester. I got vague remarks like “needs more depth” or “develop your argument”—but with no real examples. It left me confused and discouraged. Speaker 1: I think the problem is that feedback is often rushed. Lecturers have so many papers to mark, and we end up with general advice that doesn’t really help us improve. Speaker 2: I started booking one-on-one sessions with my professors to talk through the feedback. It’s a bit awkward at first, but they usually explain what they meant in more detail, and that makes it clearer. Speaker 3: Yeah, face-to-face feedback makes a huge difference. I also began using a feedback log. After each assignment, I write down the common suggestions—like “add more critical analysis” or “clarify structure”—and then I check that list when working on the next piece. Speaker 1: That’s smart. I’ve noticed that when I actually act on past feedback, my grades go up. It’s just hard not to take criticism personally sometimes. Speaker 2: Absolutely. We’re not used to seeing our work dissected so openly. But I’ve learned to treat it as a growth tool, not a personal attack. Speaker 3: Same. I also think we should be given examples of strong writing alongside our feedback. If we’re told our introduction is weak, show us a strong one from a past student. That comparison helps. Speaker 1: Yes! Without a benchmark, it’s hard to know what “good” looks like. Maybe we can suggest this in our student rep meeting—request clearer rubrics, examples, and more personalized feedback. Speaker 2: That would definitely help. If we’re expected to improve, we need a bit more guidance on how to do that. Speaker 3: Agreed. Feedback can be powerful—but only if we know how to interpret it and apply it constructively.”

30 community answers with AI feedback

SCORE 13/16

in this discussion, we hear three people talking about how they all agree on the fact that lecturers have a very negative comment towards their writings. despite of them doing it very well, they are very confused why lecturers are always disappointed with their writings and here they discuss how they just pass on the comment for the paper and the writing but they never tell them what is wrong or they never show them the actual benchmark or a proper example how it must have been done. in this discussion we hear the girl talking about how lecturers must be faced one-on-one and they have to be talked personally about this and explain them how they could have done better in this writing session and booking sessions is very necessary for students and they they also talk about how they have to release a benchmark of writing or from the previous students, they have to release a paper where they can compare and learn from the previous students and they can get to these benchmarks after correcting their mistakes. they sound very disappointed and unhappy in this situation, but they also have a proper strategies towards doing better in the next time. and the third person agrees that teachers and lecturers must pass on proper comments with correcting the mistake.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and some details of the discussion but includes a few inaccuracies and less important details. It shows sufficient comprehension and attempts to paraphrase but lacks some clarity in the relationships between points of view.

Oral Fluency:

The speech has a mostly smooth rhythm with only a few hesitations, indicating good fluency overall.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, making it easy to understand.

SCORE 13/16

the three students are talking about feedbacks. the first one said that he given essay last week, but the feedback shook him. the second student said that he knows how frustrating it can be when you put in efforts, but the feedback is negative. the third student said that feedbacks need more depth with examples so that we are able to understand it. the first student said that feedback is often rushed by people and teachers because they have a lot of copies check in a lot of feedbacks to give. the second student said that he booked one-on-one session with the professor to know the feedback and it really helped. the third student said that one-on-one sessions can be really helpful but after each assignment he she does she adds comments and then she checks then working on the next piece. the first student said that we should use feedbacks as a growth tool, not personal attack, the third student said that comparison with a better version of our work and a past student's work, a comparison shall help them in getting better. the second student agreed and said that, yes, benchmark always helps us to get better. the third, the lady at last said that feedback can be powerful only if we know how to apply it and learn from it.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and details from the discussion, but it lacks some depth in synthesizing the perspectives and includes minor inaccuracies. Overall comprehension is good.

Oral Fluency:

The response is mostly fluent with few hesitations, although there are some pauses that affect the overall smoothness.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, showing a high level of proficiency.

SCORE 13/16

The discussion happens between three people about the feedback given on their essay assignment. It starts with a person getting very discouraged because of the negative feedback that he had got because of his essay. The second and the third person acknowledge the discomfort that the first person is feeling by saying that they had experienced it earlier. They feel that efforts put are going in vain without a very critical feedback. And a general advice is not getting them anywhere. So, in order to import these things, they suggest getting on a one-on-one discussion with the person. When on a face to face discussion with the professor, a lot of feedback was helpful. They also were given real time examples on how to make the next exam better. So, in order to act on the past feedback and not to take it personally, they always used a benchmark and they concluded the discussion by saying that in the next students representative meeting, they will ask for clear guidance from their professors with help of a rule book guidance and sample benchmark examples. These things will help the students not only to be encouraged, but also to improve in their next examination.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main idea of the discussion but lacks some important details and connections between speakers' perspectives. It shows sufficient comprehension but could be more comprehensive and organized.

Oral Fluency:

The response is mostly fluent with only a few minor hesitations, indicating a good flow of speech.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation, demonstrating a high level of proficiency.

SCORE 13/16

this discussion is about feedback about their assignments. speaker one was telling that though she had put hardened sole efforts, she got a very power feedbacks and she got a feedback that she missed out the points and she felt that the feedback is rushed. so general advice cannot solve the issue. so he felt that open feedback system should be the good interactive feedback not to a personal attack. and he also felt that referring the old student feedback and older data or preferring the old feedback semi-nursable definitely a benchmark for them to use it speaker to also acknowledge the same. telling that one-on-one feedback must be clear so that they will get the good marks increased and speaker 3 also acknowledged and the last semester she mentioned that she needs more depth and more examples were not explained and she also suggested that face-to-face feedback will give more encouragement and as well as the guidance from their professors critical analysis and story writing everything will be motivated not to be a personal things should be they have mentioned. so feedback must be a powerful they can be used on a constructive way to develop their skills.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and contributions from the speakers but includes some inaccuracies and lacks a clear organization, making it somewhat challenging to follow.

Oral Fluency:

The response is mostly fluent with only a few minor hesitations, maintaining a generally smooth rhythm.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation throughout the response.

SCORE 13/16

the main discussion between the three members was about the essay which they gave previously in their exam, where they have been facing some issues regarding the essays, that the first lecture told that i have done the essay very well, but still i have got less marks and i need to know what is it regarding the second lecture also mentioned saying that yes i understand even after putting your effects and getting less mark would be in really and heartbreaking news. the lecture also mentioned saying that feedback needs to be given in every essay so that it will be helpful for the students or helpful for us to gain information in the that essay and learn the mistakes of what we made. lecturer needs to explain the detailed feedback rather than giving it in a single point. and they also suggested telling that one unknown feedback would be really helpful for the students to give their best suggestions at next time. and they also mentioned telling that this will be highlighted to the school rep so that they can take a proper feedback regarding this. the main key point about the lecture was giving feedback by a powerful meaning. thank you.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas of the discussion but includes some inaccuracies and lacks depth in synthesizing different perspectives. While it paraphrases some points, it does not fully explore the relationships between speakers' contributions.

Oral Fluency:

The response demonstrates a mostly fluent delivery with few noticeable hesitations, although there are some areas where the flow could be improved.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, making it easy to understand.

SCORE 13/16

writing an essay was the main topic of the discussion. there are several people who are talking about the steps to write essay and what mistake they are making in writing the essay. the first speaker started talking about the feedback should be critical in the essay. and furthermore he provided in for detailed information about the vulgar marks he gained in the exam due to feedback. there was also a focus on gender advices of the professor which was the best part of the discussion. second person provide his view on one answer and one describe one answer and discuss with professor. furthermore, he described that they should have a face-to-face conversation with professor so that they can develop a good essay. throughout the discussion there was a complete focus on face-to-face feedback and it was important to improve the accuracy of the essay another point of the discussion was examples which was mentioned along feedback and power of feedback with it. furthermore, the speaker had different views on group tool which and explain importance of examples. overall the discussion covered the wide range of views and helped in understanding
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and some details, but includes inaccuracies and lacks some coherence in connecting the ideas. There are attempts at reformulation, but some points are underrepresented.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with few hesitations, though some pauses are present that affect the overall flow.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation throughout the response.

SCORE 13/16

speaker 1 mentions the essays and the feedback that they receive after that. speaker 1 mentions that the feedback that he received had struck him. speaker 2 mentions that o no and says that if feedback is not clear, it's an issue. speaker 3 mentions that needs more depth and some examples are, if some examples are mentioned, that would definitely help. speaker 1 mentioned that sometimes general advice do not work. speaker 2 mentions that i have one-on-one sessions with the professors and that definitely helps. speaker 3 mentions that i make some notes from the feedback and that definitely helps me. speaker 1 mentions that without a proper benchmark, we are unable to understand what is the ideal and the correct answer. speaker to mentions that i take feedback always as a growth tool speaker three mentions that feedback is very important but if we are able to get through examples that what we are missing and what is the benchmark then we would be able to understand that what changes needs to be made for the next
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and some details of the discussion but includes a few inaccuracies and focuses more on individual perspectives than the relationships between them. The ideas are somewhat organized but could be better connected.

Oral Fluency:

The response exhibits a smooth rhythm with only a few hesitations, indicating a good level of fluency overall.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, making it easy to understand.

SCORE 13/16

in the lecture, we have three speakers talking about how feedback of s.a. is a problem. take-out one mentions how he got the feedback of his s.a. and he felt devastated. the problem is that feedback is always rushed by the professors and he noticed that when he acts on previous feedbacks, his grades usually go up. take-out two mentions how it is so frustrating when you put a lot of effort and still the feedback makes you disappointed. he started looking one-on-one sessions to understand his mistakes and without a proper benchmark it is hard to understand what would mean. bigger three mentions how she got vague remarks and she also mentioned how face-to-face feedback makes a huge difference. she also mentions how they should be given examples along with their feedback and at the end all three speakers. come to her conclusion and agree upon that feedback is necessary and feedback is helpful only then it will help them understand how to analyze and construct their own answer, test making their grades go up.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response effectively captures the main topic, individual contributions, and conclusion of the discussion.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with few hesitations, maintaining a smooth flow.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is mostly accurate with minor mispronunciations.

SCORE 13/16

the speaker has initially told us about for comparison, such as that proper guidance and a weak feedback has been given to her regarding her essay, which was actually written by herself and on her own words and knowledge, but still it was showing us plagiarism and it was showing us copied, but the speaker has shown us for feedback critical and clear make remark which actually needs to be done by more arguments. she was for one comparison suggest about the rubrics and also guide us about how to do things from previous colleagues who had done it previously. and we need a bit more guidance and apply constructively the implementation and feedback can not take it personally at all because eventually if you follow the instruction it could eventually help you increase your score and your performance as well as your grades and you know your overall credit credit credibility in the future, thank you.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and attempts to paraphrase them, but some inaccuracies and unclear phrasing detract from the overall coherence. The ideas are somewhat connected but lack smooth transitions.

Oral Fluency:

The speech has a generally smooth rhythm with a few hesitations, but overall it maintains a good flow.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, making the response easy to understand.

SCORE 13/16

three students discuss about the great feedback while they initially started that their feedback has missed the whole point they also are frustrated as the feedback being very unclear no real exams makes it more confused general advice does not help the group also further discussed that more detailed face-to-face feedback and and maintaining a detailed log of errors can help to improve. they also discussed on learning not to see the great feedback as a personal attack. also, benchmark or comparison can help them do better rather than just giving a feedback. finally, opine on suggesting the same and discussing the same in group meetings. finally, the great feedback will be powerful and useful tool if it can be used in the constructive manner.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures main ideas and some details but includes inaccuracies and lacks clarity in connections between points, showing only sufficient comprehension. Some important details were not fully represented.

Oral Fluency:

The response has a smooth rhythm with few hesitations, though there are occasional pauses that affect the overall fluency.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, demonstrating a high level of proficiency.

Master PTE with Leap's Self-Prep Course

student enroll count

Students Enrolled

review count

2,411 Reviews

app download banner image
See Course Details

Practise other Summarize Group Discussion questions

University grading system

Practice Now

Ai tools for assessment

Practice Now

Choosing university electives

Practice Now

Master PTE with Leap's Self-Prep Course

See Course Details