Managing Dissertation Work: PTE Summarize Group Discussion Question with Sample Answers

Your task

You will hear a group discussion. After listening, please summarize the discussion in your own words.

“Speaker 1: This dissertation is turning out to be more difficult than I imagined. I thought choosing a topic would be the hard part, but honestly, the actual research and writing part is overwhelming. Speaker 2: I totally get you. I spent two weeks just trying to narrow down my research question. Then I realized that finding academic sources is not as straightforward as just Googling something. I’m not even sure if I’m using the right databases. Speaker 3: Same here. I didn’t know how to differentiate between peer-reviewed articles and general articles at first. And every time I think I’m on the right track, my supervisor gives feedback that sends me back to the drawing board. Speaker 1: Yeah, and there’s this pressure to contribute something original. But how are we supposed to come up with something new when we’re still learning how to write a proper academic paper? Speaker 2: That’s been bothering me too. I finally booked a session with the library research assistant. They showed me how to use filters in academic databases and how to avoid outdated sources. Speaker 3: That’s a good idea. I’ve been relying on random websites. Maybe that’s why my literature review doesn’t feel strong. I think we need more support on how to structure arguments and write critically. Speaker 1: Agreed. I also realized that referencing is half the battle. One wrong citation style and you lose marks. It’s so time-consuming. Speaker 2: Honestly, I’ve started using citation tools like Zotero. It saves time, but you still have to double-check the format. Speaker 3: I think the key is to start early, get regular feedback, and not be afraid to ask for help. This is one of the biggest academic tasks we’ve faced, so it makes sense that it takes time to get it right.”

30 community answers with AI feedback

SCORE 15/16

the topic of discussion among the speakers was about dissertation. the first speaker mentioned how his dissertation, essays and presentation works are becoming very cumbersome and difficult to manage. he mentioned that research and writing are very overwhelming. the second speaker agreed with this and mentioned that she took two weeks to just come up with the dissertation question which ended up being wrong and she had to clarify again with her supervisor. the third speaker also mentioned that it takes time to get it peer reviewed versus generally asking questions. he also mentioned that he started using random websites in order to get help with citations. first speaker mentioned that making wrong citations can cause a lot of issues. so the second speaker mentioned that she started using citation tools in order to help manage citations in their dissertation. the third speaker mentioned that starting early and getting critical feedback and being continuously in-loop with your supervisor is very critical when you're writing a dissertation. the first speaker mentioned that taking help and looking through the databases efficiently in order to choose ideas and papers could also be something that could help. the second speaker agreed and mentioned that she already booked a library research assistant time in order to go through different databases and see the efficient ways of asking and searching for papers. overall, all the three speakers agreed that starting early with their dissertation statements and getting regular feedback is the key to success.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response effectively captures the main topic, individual opinions, and conclusion of the discussion.

Oral Fluency:

The response flows smoothly with a natural rhythm and no noticeable hesitations.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and precise throughout the response.

SCORE 14/16

the following discussion was about three students discussing their issues and challenges that they face while doing their academic dissertation. they talked about how sometimes it can be really hard to find proper scholarly resources from reputed journals or articles and how they just end up getting random resources from the internet that don't end up being reputable or credible. they also talked about the pressures of having to come up with something new and something novel to be able to present that hasn't already been put forth in the academic community, which is very difficult when you're just a student and trying to learn about this topic as you go along and trying to gain skills as you go along. they further moved on to say that when they get feedback, they think that they've done a good job, but then the feedback sends them 10 steps back and they have to do their research and do everything all over again. they went and started talking to some of the library assistants and this library assistant helped them out of them, narrowed on their resources, filtered them through proper sites to be able to get credible research and articles. they also talked about the challenges of how time consuming it is, how long it takes to do citations, and how difficult it may be to get the right citation style because a wrong citation style can cut your grade down by a lot. i talked about how they use some citation tools like zotera, but they still have to make sure that the style is correct. and the conclusion of the discussion was basically just that they need to make sure that they start early, get lots of feedback, don't be scared to ask for help and keep making corrections and changes with their feedback and know that it is totally okay to take their time to do this just as long as they do it in a proper schedule.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response effectively captures the main topic, most individual opinions, and the conclusion of the discussion.

Oral Fluency:

Fluency is mostly smooth, though there are some noticeable pauses that slightly affect the flow.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and precise with no significant errors.

SCORE 14/16

the speakers here discuss about the time that they are facing while submitting a presentation. in the following discussion, the first speaker says that he thought that only choosing a topic would be difficult for him, but eventually he realized that even writing and summarizing the topic takes equal efforts, additionally he feels that there has been always a pressure to contribute to the original writing. however, he considers that he is unable to do so when he is just at a starting point. furthermore, the second speaker says that she had spent two weeks only in research, eventually realizing that this could be done only through an online manner. she was not even sure whether she was using the right database for the presentation. however, she considers that she, with the help of the library, citation tools, she has been able to ease out the process, but she needs to double check whatever she has done. furthermore, the third speaker states that he feels that the supervisor sends him again back to normal when things are not proper. he eventually feels that he needs more support while doing a presentation which should be provided by the supervisors and they should be help and guidance for the same. furthermore, he feels that the solution to the problem is that they should be starting early and they should be getting regular feedback and not feeling the pressure of the presentation that they have to present. in conclusion, all of three agree that they should take breaks and eventually start the assignment early from the starting so that they can be able to collect enough data in submitting a presentation.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response effectively captures the main topic, includes most individual opinions, and provides a conclusion, though it lacks some synthesis of perspectives.

Oral Fluency:

The response is mostly fluent with a few hesitations but maintains overall coherence.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and articulate with no significant errors.

SCORE 14/16

the speakers here are talking about dissertation and how difficult it is to conduct the research work for their dissertation work. they initially thought that choosing a topic was a difficult action. but as they are going forward with it, they are finding the research to be even more difficult. they didn't know that coming to a question would be that difficult. but as they're going back to their advice and discussing their doubts and everything. each discussion gets them back to the drawing board, and they have to start their work again. they discuss how they're using different types of filters to narrow down their research and get rid of the outdated resource material that is available on the internet. and also some random website usage is also holding them back. they discuss that they should be given more support by their seniors and advisors. as it is one of the most difficult task they've faced in their entire careers. and they believe that referencing is also a tough choice. and at the end of the discussion, they've discussed that in conclusion that you should never hesitate to ask for help since there's one of the most important tasks of their educational field. and they should regularly ask for feedback and ask for people who have already done this and take their time to understand each point and accordingly conduct the further research so that it'll be helpful for them to go ahead.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and important details from the discussion, demonstrating good comprehension. The user paraphrases effectively and connects ideas, though there are minor inconsistencies.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with few hesitations, but there are some pauses that affect the overall flow.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, making the response easy to understand.

SCORE 14/16

(...) he frustrated with the overall experience he is facing while having this dissertation. To that the second speaker mentioned that, yes, she also spent like two weeks to complete the research part of only the literature thing. And she mentions that it's really not straightforward, like it's just not as easy as Googling it and typing it down because you have to come up with your own ideas. You can still use some citation apps like Zotero or something, but that still you have to double cross check and, you know, come up with something original, uh, basis you suggest that there are some academic helps which we can go through, like to have a proper databases, which has really helped her to frame her hesitation to that. The third speaker mentions that, yes, it's really difficult for me as well, like he has to first aggregate between peer reviewed and general articles. And still when he goes to the for the feedback, they mention that needs improvement. So, again, come back to the zero. But however, this academic databases is really a good idea and, you know, maybe more support is required for us as well to gain some articles and some kind of insights from universities so as to grow ahead. And overall, all the three speakers mentioned that the key here is to ask help and start early and also schedule some regular integrals to Recheck where you stand.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas and some important details from the discussion, reflecting good comprehension. Ideas are mostly formulated in the user's own words, though some minor inconsistencies are present. The response flows well and is easy to follow.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with few hesitations, but there are some moments where the fluency could be improved.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation throughout the response.

SCORE 14/16

the discussion revolves around the topic of dissertation and the difficulties associated with research and writing part of dissertation. speaker one talks about how there is a pressure to contribute original ideas and also talks about how using the wrong citation style gets marks deducted. speaker two emphasizes how it is hard to find academic sources and is even worried about using the wrong databases. to rectify this issue, speaker 2 has booked a session with a library research assistant who guided her upon how to filter academic sources and she has also used a website called sotero to help with her citation. speaker 3 talks about how he has trouble differentiating upon what between what is real and what isn't and how even the tiniest mistake sense and back to the drawing board. speaker 3 talks about how it's tough to structure arguments and writing. he thanks speaker 2 for her advice on how to structure and filter databases. furthermore, the discussion ends with speaker 3 talking about how it is useful to start early on dissertation, look for regular feedback and not be afraid to fail.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas and important details from the discussion, demonstrating good comprehension. It paraphrases the contributions of each speaker, although some minor inaccuracies are present.

Oral Fluency:

The response exhibits a smooth and natural rhythm with no noticeable hesitations, making it easy to follow.

Pronunciation:

There are minor mispronunciations (e.g., 'sotero' instead of 'Zotero'), but overall, the pronunciation is mostly clear and understandable.

SCORE 14/16

the group discussion is about the challenges of writing dissertation. the speaker says that choosing a topic narrowing the research portion finding peer reviewed academic sources and handling supervisor feedback are all are all difficult. they also mentioned the pressure to produce original work while still learning academic writing skills. one speaker suggests getting help from a library research assistant to use academic databases and avoid outdated sources. overall, the discussion highlights the that dissertation writing is stressful and requires proper research skills and guidance.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures main ideas and important details from the discussion, demonstrating good comprehension. It paraphrases the speakers' contributions effectively, though some minor inaccuracies were present.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is smooth and natural, with a good rhythm and no noticeable hesitations, making it easy to follow.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is mostly clear, with some minor mispronunciations that do not significantly affect understanding.

SCORE 14/16

so in this given recording, we will talk about facing difficulties in guiding an academic paper. the person one is facing difficulties to find the proper source and the same problem is being faced by the person three, two. so the person one has decided
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas but lacks some detail and coherence in connecting the speakers' contributions. It includes some inaccuracies and could expand more on the relationships between different perspectives.

Oral Fluency:

The speech has a smooth, natural rhythm with no noticeable hesitations, demonstrating excellent fluency.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, showing a high level of proficiency.

SCORE 13/16

so this question is between three people and it's about writing articles and writing research papers. so the first person says that research and writing is extremely difficult and complicated. whereas the second person says that it's true because getting the right database is definitely a problem. because right database is where you have to strike the code and third person also says that there is always a pressure to contribute to something new. and because of that, it's very difficult in order to know what to do and what not to do. and we also have to know how to use filters and avoid random references, because using filters is much better so that you don't go to random websites and random databases. and that is why, but also referencing is a problem. it also creates a problem of referencing. and citation is also a major problem, and that is why using citation tools like zotero is very good. so when you use citation tools like that, you benefit a lot and so that in order to go that well you should you should always start early and take effective feedback because when you take feedback you know where you're going wrong when you're not going wrong and when you start early when you start early you get to know that you have enough time in your hands because when you start late when you start when there are only a few days left you suffer from lack of time and because of that your marks might suffer your paper might suffer your article might suffer and that is why when you do things early you can take effective feedback early on itself and use that feedback in your right. once you use that feedback in your articles you can write better articles and then you won't have a problem. so this discussion between three people it summarizes how writing articles is difficult and how you can tackle those difficulties and how you can come up from it and do better.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and includes some details, but it lacks clarity in organization and has some inaccuracies. While it demonstrates good comprehension, it could synthesize perspectives more effectively.

Oral Fluency:

The response is mostly fluent with few hesitations, but there are occasional pauses that disrupt the natural rhythm.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and articulate, with precise articulation, making the speech easy to understand.

SCORE 13/16

the discussion is about the difficulties students face while completing their desertations. speaker and explains the dissertation has become far more difficult than expected. they originated that choosing a topic would be the hardest part, but later realized that real challenge lies in conducting research and writing paper itself. they also feel pressured to produce something original, which makes it ask even more stressful while they are still learning academic writing skills. speakers too say that completely understand the struggle because they spend two weeks simply trying to narrow down this research question. he started later discovered that finding a reliable academic source is not as easy as doing a normal internet research. he also decided to book a session with library research assistant who helped them to learn how to use academic database properly, apply filters and avoid outdated sources. kethri says that they also face confusion in the beginning, especially when trying to distinguish peer-reviewed journal articles from general articles. they mention that every time they think they are processing well, feedback from other supervisors often sends them back to the hundrawning board. he also feels that referencing his extremely time-consuming and says even one wrong citations style can cost marks. in conclusion, all three speakers agree that writing a dissertation is one of the biggest academic challenges students face, they believe success requires starting early using helpful tools such as citations software, checking regular feedback and asking for support whenever needed. they also agree that process like time, patience and gradual improvement to complete successfully.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main topic and most individual opinions but lacks some synthesis and varied vocabulary.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with a few hesitations, maintaining a good rhythm overall.

Pronunciation:

There are minor mispronunciations, but the overall articulation is mostly clear.

Show All Answers

Master PTE with Leap's Self-Prep Course

student enroll count

Students Enrolled

review count

2,411 Reviews

app download banner image
See Course Details

Practise other Summarize Group Discussion questions

University grading system

Practice Now

Ai tools for assessment

Practice Now

Choosing university electives

Practice Now

Master PTE with Leap's Self-Prep Course

See Course Details