Teacher Feedback: PTE Summarize Group Discussion Question with Sample Answers

Your task

You will hear a group discussion. After listening, please summarize the discussion in your own words.

“Speaker 1: So I got my essay back last night, and honestly, the feedback shook me. I thought I’d done a solid job, but the comments made it seem like I’d missed the whole point. Speaker 2: Oh no, I’ve been there. It’s so frustrating when you put in the effort and still feel like the feedback is overly critical or unclear. Sometimes I read the comments three times and still don’t know what I did wrong. Speaker 3: That’s exactly how I felt last semester. I got vague remarks like “needs more depth” or “develop your argument”—but with no real examples. It left me confused and discouraged. Speaker 1: I think the problem is that feedback is often rushed. Lecturers have so many papers to mark, and we end up with general advice that doesn’t really help us improve. Speaker 2: I started booking one-on-one sessions with my professors to talk through the feedback. It’s a bit awkward at first, but they usually explain what they meant in more detail, and that makes it clearer. Speaker 3: Yeah, face-to-face feedback makes a huge difference. I also began using a feedback log. After each assignment, I write down the common suggestions—like “add more critical analysis” or “clarify structure”—and then I check that list when working on the next piece. Speaker 1: That’s smart. I’ve noticed that when I actually act on past feedback, my grades go up. It’s just hard not to take criticism personally sometimes. Speaker 2: Absolutely. We’re not used to seeing our work dissected so openly. But I’ve learned to treat it as a growth tool, not a personal attack. Speaker 3: Same. I also think we should be given examples of strong writing alongside our feedback. If we’re told our introduction is weak, show us a strong one from a past student. That comparison helps. Speaker 1: Yes! Without a benchmark, it’s hard to know what “good” looks like. Maybe we can suggest this in our student rep meeting—request clearer rubrics, examples, and more personalized feedback. Speaker 2: That would definitely help. If we’re expected to improve, we need a bit more guidance on how to do that. Speaker 3: Agreed. Feedback can be powerful—but only if we know how to interpret it and apply it constructively.”

30 community answers with AI feedback

SCORE 15/16

In this discussion, the three people are talking about the feedback that has been given by the teachers. The first person talks about the comment of the whole point where he has been given of the of the particular subject, whereas the second person just talks about overall credits and he still can't able to find what he wants to get in the grades in the upper exams. Whereas third person, he just needs within a need more of a more of depth about the what the exact problems with the subject with the with an example that might help them to get more scores in the upcoming exams. And the third person also mentioned that the feedbacks, which has been given by the teachers was really an a general advice and it was overall to the people. So, what he suggested is like one on one on one session with the professor would would really help them to get more grades and more and more of in his exam and subjective says. And but as the second person suggested, face to face feedback would really help to clarify his doubts and as well as the list, what he really wanted to get more of his grades to pass his exams. But as the first person. Again, this talk, we should just take this feedback as for the subject, for our goodness and we should not take this as an a personal. So, they have. They just took this feedback as a growth tool. Second person also explains the feedback should be more and more of part and that steel that does not steels our subjects. And the third person also suggested that the teacher should set an benchmark where the people should get the grades and where should they have to make it. And the, they have just planned to just tell this in the next representative meeting to the teachers so they can just find the subjects very easily to

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas and some important details from the discussion. It reflects good comprehension and is formulated in the user's own words, although it could benefit from slightly more synthesis of different perspectives.

Oral Fluency:

The speech has a smooth and natural rhythm, with no noticeable hesitations, making it easy to follow.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation throughout the response.

SCORE 15/16

In the given discussion, the speakers are telling about difficulties of not having a structured, proper feedback systems. As for the first speaker, he got a very poor feedback from his essay. The second speaker also expressed his frustration since the feedbacks are quite unclear. The third speaker also added that usually the feedbacks are very vague without having a clear explanation. The first speaker emphasizes that usually the feedbacks are rushed because of a high demand. The second speaker also said the same. And it's better to have one-on-one sessions with the professors to explain what they really meant from the feedback. The third speaker also said that face to fact feedback has helped her and mandating a feedback lock is also beneficial. They discussed about the ways to tackle it. As per the first speaker, feedback really helps and it is better for the students to have a meeting to discuss about personalized feedback. The second speaker also added that feedback systems should be suggested as a growth tool and not as a personal attack. And with proper guidance, students will understand where they lack in fields of writing or speaking. The third speaker also suggested that while giving feedback, professors should should give them a strong example from a past student so they can interpret the feedback better and act on it. So, all these speakers have different opinions regarding it, but their goal is ultimately the same. Which is to have a good feedback system without giving general explanation, by giving a structured format. Bye.

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas of the discussion and reflects good comprehension, although it could expand on specific details from each speaker's contribution. The ideas are well formulated in the user's own words and are logically connected.

Oral Fluency:

The speech flows smoothly with a natural rhythm and no noticeable hesitations, demonstrating high proficiency in oral fluency.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation, making the response easy to understand.

SCORE 14/16

this lecture talks about three students discussing about the power of feedback. the first speaker states that his essay results came back, but the comments that were given by his professor for that essay was not very good. the essay only contained general advice. thus he states that one must act on their past feedback, only then their grades may go up. but he suggests that more guidance should be given on the same. the second speaker states that one puts their complete effort but the feedback is still not good. he suggests that one-on-one sessions with the professor are needed in order to understand one's mistakes. we need to see feedback as a growth tool, not just a personal attack. the third speaker states that no real examples are given in a feedback. it is just very generic and it is not easy to understand where the exam giver has gone wrong. thus, she states that face-to-face feedback is more helpful. one must practice strong writing, but in order to understand how to write strongly, professors must show examples of good writers, good writing from a previous student. feedback can be powerful, but only if you know how to interpret it. this is how the speakers conclude the group discussion. overall, this group discussion talks about a powerful tool known as feedback that is given to students and how they should interpret it in order to make most of their time and make sure that the grades go up.

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and important details from the discussion, demonstrating good comprehension and paraphrasing. It effectively synthesizes perspectives and maintains a coherent structure.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with only a few minor hesitations, maintaining a good flow overall.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation throughout the response.

SCORE 14/16

three people are discussing the feedback they've received on their essay during their co-semester. so the argument started when one person came back and told that he's not clear about the feedback that he's received on his essay. the others suggested facing a similar scenario. so they faced scenario where the feedback was very generic and it was difficult for them to find their mistakes and how to improve their answers for the next semesters or for the next submissions. one person suggested that meeting the professor face-to-face and getting a feedback did help her. this feedback also provided her with a feedback log which she could use as a material to write her future essays to improve her grades. another person also has done the same kind of an exercise and he was also able to improve his course. so they suggested that in their next student rep meeting they wanted to take a few points which can definitely help other students also improve their essays by possibly getting few examples and comparisons to show where the lack and what exactly was required to get good clicks. all in all, this was a discussion to make sure the essays that they were writing and the submissions got good grades.

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas and details from the discussion, reflecting good comprehension. Ideas are mostly formulated in the user's own words, with minor inconsistencies. There is a good use of expressions and vocabulary.

Oral Fluency:

The response flows well with only a few hesitations, maintaining a generally smooth rhythm.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation throughout the response.

SCORE 14/16

the three students from the university are talking about the feedback mechanisms practiced at the university. the first speaker was highly shaken by the feedback which was negative and he missed the entire point. the feedback was highly generic and hard to understand. he also felt that it was hard to take criticisms and it is difficult to comprehend such open-minded criticism. he feels that benchmark settings should be done. a personal feedback is highly important. the second speaker also agrees with him. he then booked for a one-to-one session which is more detailed and more eye-opening. he finds he's taking the feedback mechanism as a growth tool and not a personal attack. guidance can be powerful if given in the right way is what the second speaker feels. the third speaker also agrees because she also got vague remarks with no examples, no real-life examples. according to her, face-to-face conversations are effective. she writes those remarks and further takes a note of it while doing the next assignment. the example for strong benchmark is of utmost importance is what they feel. of feedback mechanism helps people only to grow in their career. thank you.

AI Feedback

Content:

The response effectively captures the main topic and most individual opinions, but could benefit from clearer synthesis.

Oral Fluency:

Fluency is mostly smooth, though it includes some pauses that affect the overall flow.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and precise with no significant errors.

SCORE 14/16

the discussion mainly focused on the feedback on essay. three participants shared their views on this matter. the first speaker told spoke about his feedback, which he received last week. and he didn't understand any comments provided by the supervisor. he told that he didn't know on what fact of the evaluation takes place. and he tells that this feedback is a growth tool and not a personal target. the second speaker told said that how much effort she applies, but the feedback is always unclear. she writes to be to write about critical analysis and she tells how comparison helps to improve her essay writing. the third speaker tells that one-on-one session is important so that they can speak personally about their feedback and they can get to know what mistakes they are making. and also in conclusion all three agreed to apply knowledge constructively and more to get more personalized feedback.

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and some details from the discussion, but it includes a few inaccuracies and lacks depth in synthesizing different perspectives. The organization is somewhat coherent but could be improved for smoother flow.

Oral Fluency:

The speech has a smooth, natural rhythm with no noticeable hesitations, contributing to overall clarity.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, making the response easy to understand.

SCORE 13/16

so this whole discussion was about feedbacks and about essay writing and the first person says that he got his essay feedback and the comments that were given on his essay they felt they felt overly critical and that the second person says that it's true that he also sees feedback on his essay and he does not know where he went wrong etc and those comments they kind of feel overly critical to that the third person says that yeah even she got feedback that you know her essay is more depth but no examples of so if you didn't understand that the first person says that he felt that the feedback is zerized and it's not a thought of while giving and that is why it does not know that where he went wrong to that the second person also agrees and the third person says that our professors should, our professors should give proper feedback so she began using feedback forms after her essay so that all those feedback forms and she can collect the data and then you can implement it accordingly, so that the first person says that yeah it's agreed because acting on field back makes the grades go up and when he acted on his field back he actually saw improved results, so that the second person says that one on one session also makes it effective as sitting one on one with your professors makes them move personalized with you, it also gives you enough attention, it also makes you realize where you went wrong. that the third person says that it also gives you like a better understanding and they also give you examples of strong writing. so when you get examples of previous rubens and previous writings and with the past people have done, you can act effectively and accordingly and that the first person says that you have benchmarks should be given and when you act on benchmarks, you can actually be successful and that the second person says that you have benchmarks should be given and we should act accordingly on those benchmarks and the third person says that yeah, we should also effectively apply the feedback that is given to us because it helps a lot.

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and some details of individual speakers' contributions, but it includes some inaccuracies and lacks a clear organization, making it somewhat difficult to follow.

Oral Fluency:

The response demonstrates a good level of fluency with only a few hesitations, but it could be smoother and more natural.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation, allowing for easy understanding.

SCORE 13/16

The three speakers here are talking about the ASR submission and how they got the feedback through the guides. So, the speaker first initiated a topic saying that he thought he really did a good, great job. However, when he received the feedback from the mentor, he was completely devastated. Because he felt that somehow the feedback is often rushed because professors are having a lot of assignments to be checked and they might just end up giving just whatever they feel to that. The second speaker said that, yeah for him also, it was a frustrating experience. And, um, what he feels that, uh, he recommended for one-on-one session because when that happened, he felt that they will explain their feedback more cla with more clarity, which will help them to revise their entire essay and, you know, end up high scoring high to that. The third speaker mentions that same. She felt the same exactly like she once even received vague remarks where there were no real examples to prove that vague remarks. However, she mentioned that she H has a particular feedback log where she H kind of checklists everything whenever she is resubmitting the essay to that. Uh, all the three speakers were kind of letting know that it's not about how to act on past, but if you try to do feed, try to take the feedback positively, the scores may rise up and it's more like a growth tool not in a point of personal attack or something. So, feedback should be taken very constructively. And they also recommend all the three speakers at the end concluded that they will request for more personalized feedback. So that they can interpret their entire session and also apply these feedbacks more constructively and even suggest some standard or so strong benchmark so that they can follow those and score eventually better.

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas and some important details from the discussion, reflecting good comprehension. There are minor inconsistencies, but overall, the ideas are well organized and connected.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with a smooth rhythm, though there are a few hesitations that slightly affect the flow.

Pronunciation:

There are minor mispronunciations, but the overall pronunciation is mostly accurate and clear.

SCORE 13/16

so i got my essay back last night and the feedback shocked me also. i genuinely thought i had a done a solid job, but because i put a lot of effort and i was confident about my content. but when i read the comments, i felt like i completely missed the point of the assignment. and that was really discouraging. i think many students can relate to this. it is frustrating when you work hard, but the feedback feels overall critical or unclear. sometimes the lecturer writes comments like needs more depth or develop your argument. but they don't give specific examples. so even after reading the feedback multiple times. so you don't understand what exactly went wrong or how to improve that next time. in my opinion, one major reason is that a lecturer's have so many papers to mark so they often give general feedback rather than detail the guidance. that's why i started taking a more active approach instead of just reading comments and feeling upset. i began booking short sessions with my professors to discuss and feedback. it first it feels awkward but most professors are actually helpful. when they explain the comments face to face it become much clearer and you can understand what they really expect. another thing that helped me in tracking feedback pattern after each assignment, i write down the common suggestions. i get like adding more critical analysis, borrowing structure or making arguments clearer. then before starting my text is essay, i check that list so i don't repeat the same mistakes again. overall, i've realized the feedback is not meant to encourage us. it mean to guide us. if we take it positively and act on it, it really helps improve our academic

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas and important details from the discussion, reflecting good comprehension. Ideas are formulated in the user's own words with minor inconsistencies.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with few hesitations, but some pauses and disfluencies are noted that slightly affect the overall flow.

Pronunciation:

There are minor mispronunciations present, but overall the pronunciation is mostly clear and understandable.

SCORE 13/16

in the given recording, there are two students, one female and male, they both are discussing about the feedback, which is given to them for their previous examination, and they are talking about the feedback, and they are not satisfied with the feedback as they did very good, but the feedback, which they called by the lecturer, that is very bad, and they are not, they couldn't digest that because they did very good in the examination, but they are then telling the different ways how they can book the one on one feedback with the professor to discuss about the feedbacks and what mistakes they have done so that they are they got these type of feedbacks and then they talk about the feedback of procedure that it should need more advances and it should be more specific and it should be and the references should be given to the students or the previous students so that they can get the more idea how they can score more than only the feedback are useful and they are giving the false feedback because the lecturers are overburdened and they are giving the feedbacks in very hurry. they are not doing it like 100% authentic. they are just randomly writing anything in the feedbacks. it should be more concise and more meaningful according to the students performance. it should not be like randomly giving. so, they talk about one and one of ways to face feedback should be given with the written comments and the feedback so that they can improve much more better and they can perform in the coming examination better by having these authentic feedbacks we can improve in their examination and they can score much more better in such a way.

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas but includes inaccuracies and lacks some detail in synthesizing the perspectives of the speakers. It shows an adequate understanding of the discussion but does not fully explore the relationships between the points of view.

Oral Fluency:

The speech has a smooth rhythm with few hesitations, though there are some moments of disfluency that affect the overall flow.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, making it easy to understand.

Show All Answers