On Campus vs Off Campus Life: PTE Summarize Group Discussion Question with Sample Answers - Page 3
Your task
You will hear a group discussion. After listening, please summarize the discussion in your own words.
30 community answers with AI feedback
30 community answers with AI feedback
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas and some details from the discussion but lacks depth in synthesizing perspectives. While it reflects good comprehension, there are minor inaccuracies and a few ideas are underrepresented.
Oral Fluency:
The speech is generally fluent with a smooth rhythm, though there are occasional pauses that slightly disrupt the flow.
Pronunciation:
The pronunciation is mostly clear with some minor mispronunciations, which do not significantly affect overall understanding.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas and some details from the discussion, but there are inaccuracies and a lack of clarity in certain parts. The relationships between different perspectives are noted, but not fully synthesized, and the organization could be improved.
Oral Fluency:
The speech is generally fluent with a natural rhythm, but there are occasional pauses that disrupt the flow.
Pronunciation:
Pronunciation is mostly clear with minor mispronunciations, but some words are not articulated accurately, affecting overall clarity.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas of the discussion but lacks depth in exploring relationships between different points of view. Some important details are missing, and the organization could be improved for better coherence.
Oral Fluency:
The response is generally fluent with a smooth rhythm, but there are occasional hesitations that affect the overall flow.
Pronunciation:
Pronunciation is mostly clear, with minor mispronunciations that do not significantly hinder understanding.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and some details, but there are inaccuracies and a lack of depth in synthesizing perspectives. The organization is somewhat clear but could be improved.
Oral Fluency:
The speech is fairly fluent with a natural rhythm, though there are some hesitations that affect the overall flow.
Pronunciation:
The pronunciation is mostly clear with minor mispronunciations that do not significantly hinder understanding.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas of the discussion but includes some inaccuracies and lacks depth in synthesizing the different perspectives. Some key points were either missed or inadequately represented.
Oral Fluency:
The speech demonstrates good fluency with occasional pauses, but the rhythm is mostly smooth and natural.
Pronunciation:
The pronunciation is generally clear with minor mispronunciations that do not significantly impact understanding.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and includes some details of the speakers' contributions, but it lacks depth in synthesizing perspectives and has minor inaccuracies.
Oral Fluency:
The speech is generally smooth with occasional pauses, but it maintains a good rhythm overall.
Pronunciation:
The pronunciation is mostly clear with minor mispronunciations that do not significantly hinder understanding.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas and some details from the discussion but lacks some accuracy and depth in synthesizing the perspectives. There are minor inconsistencies and a few important points are underrepresented.
Oral Fluency:
The speech is generally fluent with a smooth rhythm, but there are occasional hesitations that affect the overall flow.
Pronunciation:
Pronunciation is mostly accurate with minor mispronunciations that do not significantly hinder understanding.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main topic and conclusion but misses some individual opinions and details.
Oral Fluency:
The response is mostly fluent with few hesitations, but some parts could be smoother.
Pronunciation:
There are minor mispronunciations, but overall articulation is mostly clear.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas and some details from the discussion but lacks depth in synthesizing the perspectives of the speakers and has some inaccuracies.
Oral Fluency:
The speech is mostly fluent with occasional pauses, but the overall rhythm is smooth and understandable.
Pronunciation:
The pronunciation is generally clear with minor mispronunciations that do not significantly hinder understanding.
SCORE 12/16

AI Feedback
AI Feedback
Content:
The response captures the main ideas and some details from the discussion, but there are inaccuracies and a lack of depth in exploring relationships between perspectives. Some ideas are presented without sufficient clarity or organization.
Oral Fluency:
The response demonstrates a good level of fluency with few hesitations, but there are some pauses that affect the overall flow.
Pronunciation:
The pronunciation is generally clear, with only minor mispronunciations that do not significantly hinder understanding.
How to approach it
- Track the speakers. Note who argues what as you listen.
- Open with the topic. State what the group discussed.
- Summarize each view. Briefly give the main positions.
- State the outcome. Did they agree, disagree, or reach a compromise?
Model Answer
this group discussion is based on on campus life and off campus life. there are three speakers in this group discussion. the first speaker states that she lives on campus and she lives in an on campus dormitory which is more comfortable. however, there is a lack of privacy and being on-site makes everything accessible and you can also do nighttime group projects. however she wants to move out next semester to prevent noisy neighbors and many other issues. the second speaker lives off campus and he states that off-campus causes him to commute longer but he has his own kitchen and he has more freedom. he thinks that being off-campus is cheaper but it is a huge responsibility because you have to cook your own food, be responsible for yourself, pay your own bills and remember all these things to do it on time. and the third speaker states that he has tried both living on campus and off campus. he states that being on campus requires structure and he liked the sense of community because you have people around you, especially of the same age. also states that being on campus, you never really get detached from university life because you are always living in the university. whereas when he tried off campus, he noticed that he had a better work life balance and he was independent. so he concludes saying that being on campus or off campus is based on the type of personality you are. if you like a few things then you can be on campus otherwise you can prefer off campus.