Academic Writing Difficulties: PTE Summarize Group Discussion Question with Sample Answers - Page 3

Your task

You will hear a group discussion. After listening, please summarize the discussion in your own words.

“Speaker 1: One thing I found really difficult after starting university was adjusting to the academic writing style. In high school, writing essays was more about expressing ideas clearly and following a structure. But here, there are so many additional expectations—like referencing, critical thinking, and using academic sources properly. Speaker 2: I can totally relate. The first essay I submitted got an average grade even though I thought I had written it well. The feedback said I needed to engage with the literature more deeply and that my argument lacked depth. Honestly, I wasn’t even sure what that meant at the time. Speaker 3: Same here. I think one of the biggest shifts is realizing that university essays aren’t just about presenting facts. It’s more about building an argument based on evidence, and positioning your view within the academic conversation. That was a completely new way of thinking for me. Speaker 1: And don’t get me started on referencing styles. MLA, APA, Harvard—every professor seems to prefer a different one. I spend more time trying to format my bibliography than writing the essay sometimes! Speaker 2: Exactly. I think universities should offer a crash course on academic writing in the first semester. Just one short course to explain how to structure arguments, use evidence, and cite sources correctly. It would save us so much confusion. Speaker 3: Actually, I found the writing center on campus really helpful. I booked a few appointments where they reviewed my drafts and helped me refine my arguments. It’s free, and they even show you how to avoid plagiarism by paraphrasing properly. Speaker 1: That’s good to know! I’ve also started reading sample essays and analyzing how they’re structured. It helps to see what a strong academic voice looks like. I’m slowly getting better, but it’s definitely a learning curve. Speaker 2: Same here. I think once you understand the expectations and practice regularly, it becomes more manageable. But initially, it’s a steep climb. Speaker 3: Yeah, but it’s a skill worth mastering. Academic writing is something we’ll need throughout university and maybe even beyond.”

30 community answers with AI feedback

SCORE 13/16

the speaker one talked about the difficulty of the joining university is the academic essay which she has always faced an issue with and she specifies about how writing a academic style is and something she needs to learn on she further specified about every professor from harvard university is referred to different style and she also specified about exploring the bibliologia graph this speaker took a breeze with speaker one and highlighted that we first said that he has written in the academy-tone lag references. he further specified about one short course that needs to be introduced in semista should have a crash course and that provides information on university categories. and he thinks that once you understand the expertise and practice regularly with the reference hands then it would be easy to write university academic essays. the speaker 3 agrees with speaker 1 and speaker 2 and highlighted about the references and the lack of topics on the university essays and he should specify about avoiding play algorithm. well, semester further we mentioned about the academic essays skill and maybe developed and go beyond mastering it.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and some details, but there are inaccuracies and a lack of clear connections between points. Some ideas are underrepresented.

Oral Fluency:

The response is fluent with a smooth rhythm and no noticeable hesitations, making it easy to follow.

Pronunciation:

There are minor mispronunciations, but overall, the pronunciation is mostly clear and understandable.

SCORE 13/16

the speakers were discussing about the adjustment in academic writing. speaker 1 expressed that her ideas were fine, but when it comes to writing, they have to include referencing and different styles of reference have to be done. she tried reading sample essays, which made her understand the strong academic story writing how it looked like. and speaker 2 mentioned, he got an average grade even though he mentioned everything. when he looked into feedback, he understood that he has to engage with the content. he also suggested that university has to do a crash course in first semester to understand the structure and arguments so that he can save time from confusion. speaker 3 mentioned, the building, the rebuilding of the writing has to be based on content and how he booked appointments from a library and then with the help with the structure and formatting it. he also mentioned that it has to be learnt as it is a skilled development and it is required. overall, they all understood how the academic writing has to be adjusted based on referencing and different styles and how strong the economics story writing has to be developed.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and some details of individual speakers' contributions, but there are a few inaccuracies and a lack of depth in synthesizing perspectives. Overall comprehension is evident, but the organization could be improved for clarity.

Oral Fluency:

The response demonstrates good fluency with only a few hesitations, maintaining a mostly smooth rhythm, though there are some pauses that slightly affect the overall flow.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation throughout the response, making it easy to understand.

SCORE 13/16

after listening to the group discussion, it was clear that the main topic was about the university styles. the participants shared various perspectives over the issues. the speaker one explained that there is a different academic style problem. problem in following structure, problem in using academic sources using apis difficulty to learn, writing essays, sample essays, and it is easy to understand from the essays. and other speaker tells certain crash codes for post semester. if it is viewed, it is helpful for understanding the arguments and easy to structuralize the arguments. it should solve the issue. there is more expectation on the universities. we can practice regularly and scoring good. it is very useful that crash course can be offered in a first semester. the speaker 3 explains that projecting fact academic conversation. it is reviews of my essays. in this overall conversation there is many advantages and disadvantages over the universities. there are different difficulties. there are a mixture talk about the universities, academic structures.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and some details of the discussion, but there are inaccuracies and a lack of clarity in some points. The organization could be improved for better coherence.

Oral Fluency:

There are few hesitations, and the speech is mostly fluent, but there are some pauses that affect the overall smoothness.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation, demonstrating a high level of proficiency.

SCORE 13/16

so here in this recording there are three speakers and they are talking about the importance of writing in the university and the style of education in the university. so far as it's because it's saying that in my university they are saying that the first speaker is saying that they are focusing more on the writing style but there should be proper referencing and there should be a sample essay writing should be there. second speaker is also saying that there should be a deep knowledge, there should be a class course which can provide a structured argument while the third speaker is saying building the argument is very important in the university based on the fact the argument should be there and refining the argument is important fact. so here we can see that all the three speakers are just explaining what they want to include in the university education. only writing is not sufficient but they have to make the refined argument and make their education more better by providing some structure argument and by referencing some other resources.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and some details of the discussion, but it lacks clarity and organization in the expression of ideas. There are inaccuracies and some repetition, which affects the overall coherence.

Oral Fluency:

The speech has a generally smooth flow with few hesitations, though there are some pauses that affect the overall rhythm.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and articulate with only minor mispronunciations that do not hinder understanding.

SCORE 13/16

some students are discussing that they are finding difficulties regarding academic style of writing issues. because it consists of expressing your own idea, referencing and critical thinking, etc. which though they did not use in their school life. so, but one student told that feedback is very much important and the biggest thing is critical thinking and some professor want one thing which differ from another one. so they are thinking that university should offer a crash course, a short crash course so that they can think very clearly what they are wanting to write in their essay. another person suggested them to go to campus books because they held those sample places help them to build an idea of what the university is wanting. so, the practice will help them to make it perfect. and one student told that he is now improving day by day. so, academic writing is not only required in university, but it is required beyond. so, in this way, they are discussing the need to know the academic study.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas of the discussion and some details, but includes inaccuracies and lacks a clear organization, making it less coherent than a higher-scoring response.

Oral Fluency:

The response is mostly fluent with a smooth rhythm, though there are occasional pauses that affect the overall flow slightly.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is clear and natural, with precise articulation, showing a high level of proficiency.

SCORE 13/16

the discussion is about adjusting to academic style writing. speaker 1 mentions how difficult it is to follow the academic style writing as in college they had to just follow a structure. speaker 2 mentions that they got an average grade and mentioned that they got a feedback that it's not as engaging with literature as it should be. and this speaker 3 mentions that it's not about facts but more about evidence. each professor prefers different referring styles, which becomes difficult according to speaker 1. speaker 2 mentions a solution where he says that crash course for academic in writing is really necessary. speaker 3 mentions writing center really helped them work through the academic writing style. sample essays has also helped to speak a one. in conclusion, they all come to an agreement that the better way for learning is to practice regularly. and it is a skill that should be mastered. and hence, it's a learning curve, so it is going to take time for them to master the skill.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas and some important details from the discussion, demonstrating good comprehension. Ideas are mostly formulated in the user's own words, with minor inconsistencies that do not detract from the overall meaning.

Oral Fluency:

The response has a generally smooth rhythm with a few hesitations, indicating good fluency overall.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is mostly clear and natural, with only minor mispronunciations present, making it understandable.

SCORE 13/16

The main focus of the discussion was how difficult and different the academic style of writing is. They were referring to how how to structure the argument. And, uh, while they were talking about this, the second speaker spoke about, she can relate and she was, uh, she wrote a very good essay but still got average grade. Seems like they liked the argument and they did not went into the depth of the while they were discussing that the third person said that university assets are completely different and difficult. They had to go through a new way of thinking in order to get those things, uh, while they were discussing that, the first speaker spoke about how to structure the argument. And he also spoke about picking up a crash course, a short crash course in order to excel in writing. So, to summarize, uh, all all three of them were talking about how to get better. In writing the essay, they all come to a conclusion that practice will help them to write more properly and easily.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas of the discussion and reflects good comprehension, although it lacks some details and depth in synthesizing perspectives.

Oral Fluency:

The response is mostly fluent with few hesitations, though there are occasional pauses that affect the overall flow.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is mostly clear with minor mispronunciations that do not significantly hinder understanding.

SCORE 13/16

in this conversation, there were three students who were discussing about the writing style and how it differs from pre-university to post-university, especially when we talk about the referencing, the critical thinking and the academic sourcing. so, the lady was talking about the mla, apa and harvard and how she can improve the bibliography with strong academic voice. the mail was talking about how to engage deeply, because if it lacks depth, it is of no use. and also that how to strengthen the argument. and it is vital to practice this entire practice regularly. and the third person was talking about that it is not just fact which you have to present but also the academic rigor. the writing center is of particular helpful. we need to avoid plagiarism and it is also skill which is worth practicing.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas and important details of the discussion, reflecting good comprehension. It is mostly formulated in the user's own words with minor inconsistencies.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with few hesitations, although there are some pauses that slightly affect the overall flow.

Pronunciation:

The pronunciation is mostly accurate with some minor mispronunciations that do not significantly impact clarity.

SCORE 13/16

The discussion was mainly about the academic writing style, which was also the main topic of the conversion. There were several speakers sharing their views on academic style and writing. The first speaker started by talking about they have different academic style, which it is difficult have to adopt one. After which she also provided a detailed explanation on how ready and examples should be slowly learned by practicing. And they were also focusing on, I say, average grade literature deeply and also discussed about offering crash scores. And the second speakers focused on practicing more as they have to improve their skills. So, the conversion there was a main topic of the discussion, which is building on argument and defining argument. Another point of the discussion was improving the skills.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response accurately captures the main ideas and some important details from the discussion, demonstrating good comprehension and paraphrasing. However, it lacks some depth in synthesizing perspectives.

Oral Fluency:

The speech is mostly fluent with few hesitations, maintaining a good rhythm throughout.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is mostly clear with minor mispronunciations that do not hinder understanding.

SCORE 13/16

the three speakers speak about the academic writing style. the first speaker speaks about the reference critical thinking and three style performance professor different one and sample essay reading is one of the best idea to get the academic reading style. second speaker mentioned about the average grade in first essay because of the assessment still adapt and you also mentioned that university should offer course in the first method to short course the evidence and side source and identify the practice to get the best academic writing style. third speaker presents more about the arguments, writing the point find arguments and paraphrasing. writing is the master key for the academic writings. time.
sparkle icon

AI Feedback

Content:

The response captures the main ideas but includes some inaccuracies and lacks depth in synthesizing different perspectives. It shows a basic understanding but does not fully explore relationships between the speakers' points.

Oral Fluency:

The response is mostly fluent with few hesitations, although there are some instances where the flow could be improved.

Pronunciation:

Pronunciation is clear and natural with precise articulation, making it easy to understand.

Master PTE with Leap's Self-Prep Course

student enroll count

Students Enrolled

review count

2,411 Reviews

app download banner image
See Course Details

Practise other Summarize Group Discussion questions

University grading system

Practice Now

Ai tools for assessment

Practice Now

Choosing university electives

Practice Now

Master PTE with Leap's Self-Prep Course

See Course Details