Some People Think That All University: How to Answer
Essays must always start with a clear introduction that restates the question and states your opinion. Each body paragraph should focus on one main idea with examples or arguments. Use transition words to connect your ideas.
Since this is both views type of essay, you must try to strike a balance despite your personal views!
In the end, you can summarise your main points and repeat your opinion. Keep your writing clear, logical, and accurate, using a range of vocabulary and grammar effectively.
The topic will look like this:
Here's a more detailed breakdown of how to structure and answer the essay on the topic "Some People Think That All University" in the ' both views ' format:
Introduction
- Introduce the topic: Introduce the debate about university subject choices.
- State both viewpoints: Mention both perspectives.
- Thesis statement: State your opinion.
Body Paragraph 1 - Viewpoint 1
- Topic Sentence: Introduce the viewpoint that students should study what they like.
- Explanation: Explain reasons why some support this view.
- Example: Provide examples illustrating this viewpoint.
- Analysis: Discuss the implications of this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 2 - Viewpoint 2
- Topic Sentence: Introduce the viewpoint that students should study useful subjects.
- Explanation: Explain reasons why others support this view.
- Example: Provide examples illustrating this viewpoint.
- Analysis: Discuss the implications of this viewpoint.
Body Paragraph 3 - Your Opinion
- Topic Sentence: State your opinion.
- Reasons: Provide reasons supporting your opinion.
- Example: Offer evidence or examples.
Conclusion
- Summarise both viewpoints: Briefly restate both perspectives.
- Restate your opinion: Reinforce your position.
- Final Thought: Conclude with a final thought.
Some People Think That All University: Sample Essay
Let's explore essay samples for Some People Think That All University.
Introduction
The debate over whether university students should choose subjects they are passionate about or focus on those that are useful for future careers is a contentious one. Some believe that personal interest should guide academic choices, while others argue that practicality should prevail. In my opinion, a balance between these two approaches is the most beneficial.
Body
Proponents of allowing students to study what they enjoy argue that this fosters creativity and personal growth. For example, a student passionate about literature can develop critical thinking and analytical skills that are valuable in various fields. This approach can lead to higher engagement and better academic performance, as students are more likely to excel in subjects they are passionate about.
Conversely, those who advocate for focusing on practical subjects like science and technology emphasise the importance of job readiness. With the rapid advancement of technology, there is a growing demand for professionals in STEM fields. Graduates with degrees in these areas often have better job prospects and higher earning potential. This viewpoint suggests that universities are responsible for preparing students for the realities of the job market.
In my view, universities should adopt a balanced approach, allowing students to pursue their interests while ensuring they acquire practical skills. For instance, a philosophy student could also take computer science courses. This combination can provide a well-rounded education, equipping students with both passion and practicality.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while studying subjects of personal interest can foster creativity, focusing on practical subjects ensures better job prospects. A balanced approach, integrating both perspectives, offers the most comprehensive education, benefiting both students and society.
