Energy Capacity Comparisons

The graph delineates the comparison between energy capacity proportion of 2010 and the projections suggested for the year 2050. The parameters mentioned in the graph are, sources of energy and percentage. Overall, a huge difference can be seen for non-renewable and solar energy, whereas the same magnitude of difference is not seen in the other two categories. To begin with, it is evident that the energy capacity in the year 2050 for non-renewable source will be slightly less than half of the percentage in 2010.Next, by a glance at the graph we can observe that there will be a 10% increase in biomass and biofuel source of energy by the year 2050. In comparison to the projection of 2050, we can discover hardly a change of 1% in the bracket of water and geothermal energy in 2010.On the contrary, we can notice a spike in the projection for solar enegry of approximately 30% by the year 2050.This is the largest difference seen on the graph compared to other entities.

The bar diagram compares the energy sources such as Non-renewable energy, biomass & biofuel, water & geothermal and solar energy in 2010 and 2050. The unit of measurement is percentage for references. Overall, It is evident that non-renewable energy was significantly higher percentage when compared to the other energy resources while other sources didn't exceed more than fifty perecentage over the years. To begin with, in 2010, Although production of non-renewable energy had the highest percentage, accounting for 73 % approximately. it had the least energy production from biomass and fuel, with just under 5 %. Similarily, energy capactiy from water & geothermal and solar sources had low production, with just under 15 %. On the other hand, in 2050, Constrastly, it is predicted that solar energy will have the highest energy production, accounting for 39 %. when compared to other sources. with non-renewable energy holds the second highest energy production with 35 %. Moreover, energy sources from water & geothermal sources will be slightly increased from 11% in 2010 to 12% in 2050. Additionally, the biomass and biofuel Production has increased more than 10 % in 2050.

The graph depicts the energy capacity over 4 decades with projection between the year 2010 and 2050.On the X axis we have various sources of energy and percentage on Y axis. Although there are several ups and downs over the years, now we will summarise and compare the relevant features and report them. The Non-renewable energy in the year 2010 was around 75 percent and it was one of the highest used energy capacity in whereas in 2050 there is a sudden drop which went upto 35 percent. Energy capacity from Biomass and biofuel was somewhere around 5 percent in the year 2010, and it crossed 19 percent in the year 2050. Water and geothermal energy capacity maintained almost same throughout 4 decades, which is around 10 percent. Solar energy capacity in the year 2010 was around 9 percent, but in the year 2050 there was a drastic increase in the percentage which went upto somewhere around 40 percent.

The bar graph differentiates between the percentage of energy volume (Non Renewable, Biomass and biofuel, Water and geothermal, Solar) in the year 2010 and the estimate put together for it for the year 2050. Overall, the capacity was highest for Non-renewable energy, accounting for 75%, during 2010. According to the assumption, Solar energy is going to equate to almost 40% by 2050. For the year 2010, it can be noticed in the chart that apart from the extensive use of Non-renewable energy, the use of water and geothermal is only 12%, followed by solar at 10%, and then biomass and biofuel at 5%. In contrast, for 2050, the use of non renewable energy is expected to decline, amounting to 35%, whereas the usage of biomass and biofuel will double. Furthermore, water and geothermal energy's utility will not witness major change. This will remain around 12-13%. However, Solar energy's capacity is supposed to gain substantially by approximately four times.

The given bar graph illustrates the comparison between the proportion of energy capacity in 2010 with the projections made for to 2050 for four different sources of energy. The unit measured is in percentage of energy. Overall, it can be observed that percentage of energy capacity is gradually decreasing for the sources of energy except solar energy which is predicted to reach its peak by 2050.However, non-renewable energy still has the highest proportion of energy capacity. In 2010, non-renewable source of energy had the highest capacity, almost three fourth of total energy capacity.Following that, the water and geothermal energy source comprises around 11% of energy. The solar energy and biomass and biofuel energy are found quite less which is 9% and 5% respectively. On the other hand, the prediction for 2050 are showcase that, there will be significant rise in the solar energy capacity which will around 39%. However, on the contrary, there will be drastical drop in the energy capacity of non-renewable source of energy comprising around one third of total energy capacity. Additionally, similar energy capacity is being predicted for energy sources like biomass and biofuel and water and geothermal which is 14%.