Is it better to do a two-year master's in India and then go abroad or directly pursue master's abroad?
Directly pursuing your master's abroad is usually the better choice if your goal is international exposure and global career opportunities.
- Direct master's abroad: Offers early access to global education, diverse perspectives, and stronger job prospects in international markets. You also save time by entering the workforce sooner.
- Master's in India first: Can be more affordable and comfortable, but delays your international experience and entry into global job markets.
If finances are a concern or you prefer a gradual transition, starting in India is reasonable. Otherwise, going abroad directly is generally more advantageous for career growth. For personalized advice based on your goals and situation, connect with your LeapScholar counsellor.
Still have doubts?
Speak to a LeapScholar expert — free, no obligations.
More Cost & living questions
- What is the fee range for a one-year MBA course compared to a two-year course in UK?
- What is the minimum budget required for studying abroad in Canada or Ireland for two years?
- Can you provide the best UK university options for a Master's within my budget?
- Will I be eligible for a post-study work permit after completing my master's degree in history in USA?
- What are the tuition fees for studying in Germany for a Master's/Bachelor's?
- What do you think are the chances of living a very comfortable life in the UK compared to India considering expenses?
- How much are the average monthly living expenses in East London including rent and other costs?
- Are there free IELTS band prediction tests available to assess current English proficiency?
