Which master's specialisation suits a Media and Mass Communication graduate with 3 years of professional experience in technical communication?

Three years spent making complex information usable for someone else is, in practice, most of the job description for a UX writer or researcher. The open question isn't whether your background transfers, it's whether you want to formalise that transfer through an HCI master's or deepen your current lane instead.

Turning Three Years of Technical Writing Into a UX Career

• HCI or UX Design: Adds user research, wireframing, and information architecture on top of skills you're already using, opening roles like UX Writer, UX Researcher, or Product Designer.
• Technical Communication or Information Design and Strategy: The direct extension of your current path, moving you from mid-level writing into Information Architect or Documentation Manager roles.
• Digital Marketing and Analytics: A pivot option if you want to trade structural writing for data-driven content strategy, useful if your three years also touched SEO or content performance.

Technical Communication Master's Vs UX: What Actually Differs

A dedicated Technical Communication master's deepens the exact skillset you already have, useful if you're aiming for a senior documentation or content-strategy title at your current employer or a similar one. An HCI or UX master's is the bigger career pivot: it broadens what you're qualified for into product and design teams, but it also means competing against candidates from design and psychology backgrounds who don't share your writing background.

My Advice

In my experience, technical communicators who make the HCI pivot successfully usually build a small UX research or writing portfolio project alongside their applications, since admissions committees for these programs want evidence you can think like a researcher, not just write clearly. If you'd rather stay closer to a guaranteed outcome, the Technical Communication route is the lower-risk choice.